Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Review: Ted (2012)


Seth Macfarlane’s big screen writing debut has its hits and its misses, but on the whole was a lot better than I expected. I heard on the grapevine that the premise, a grown man who lives with his magically living teddy bear, was meant to be a series but Macfarlane and executives felt that it wouldn’t have the steam for a very big run and I think that the movie format was almost certainly a better call… even it began to lose momentum at stages. Unlike Family Guy, ‘Ted’s humour is derived from the plot as opposed to random inserts, however, at times, particular at both ends of the film that family guy disconnectedness shines through.

Performances on the whole are pretty good. The cast all nail very convincing Boston Twangs over their speech that definitely helps cement the story on the real world. A little more characterisation would have been nice; the characters aren’t fully fleshed out, which does hark back to the idea of being a long running series. I suppose that in long running cartoon series, with a few exceptions, the audience is given twenty episodes or thereabouts to slowly develop the characters, who are developed through plot, however, in an hour forty movie a little more detailed process needs to be applied and I don’t feel as if Ted did this. I really feel that the movie would have been better for it and that newcomers to Macfarlane’s material may have found this a little jarring.

The comedy is sharper then Mr. Macfarlane’s usual material. The timing and general connectivity is very clean and organic. Conservatives be warned: this film certainly goes out of its way at times to offend and makes no effort to pull its punches. I love this style of humour but it certainly isn’t for everyone and admittedly the shock and awe tactics that are inherent to it do not allow for an immense amount of replayability. The jokes are a little hit and miss, but on the whole the audience that was crammed into the screening I attended was in stitches.

The animation on Ted is superb although I don’t imagine this was a momentous task. Ted is integrated seamlessly into the world and I found myself forgetting he was a computerized conjuration. The stock footage of Ted’s celebrity career and magazine cutouts were an extremely nice touch and looked the most natural. The small wear and tear provides a stark contrast from the flashback at the start of the film to Ted’s overall composition after the climax.  Macfarlane’s voice work is outstanding as usual and truly speaks to the vocal range of the man. Best of all, the rapport between Macfarlane and Wahlberg is fantastic and creates a believable relationship, something that as I have said, I wish was more developed.

‘Ted’ is certainly not a flawless film, but for the most part it is damn funny. I really hope that Macfarlane has future screen projects in mind, as I am sure that over time he could really start to churn out some masterworks of comedy. If you want a few laughs with your mates at the expense of a little good taste then make sure to scout this one out.

Alex
Wanted: Thunder Buddy

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Review: The Amazing Spider-man (2012)



Movies, like good books, should mostly be viewed as separate entities from one another- each needs to be given the opportunity to present itself  without be afflicted/propelled by the failures/successes of its counterparts. That being said when you re-launch a series only 10 years after its last stint, you can expect audiences to be thoroughly annoyed, especially when the original is so good. You genuinely have to believe you can bring something that can utterly decimate the original, lest your attempt be seen as a money grab. ‘The Amazing Spider-man’ deserves the punishment (how ironic considering the mastery of Sam Raimi’s original) of being bound to its previous efforts. 


Let me open by saying that Spidey’s latest adventure is actually OK, in fact it is good. I am still pretty damn annoyed though that this was a re-launch and not a continuation and the movie is certainly not without fault. Actually, had it been released first it probably would have been incredible. It doesn’t add to the mythos in a way that I think is substantial enough to warrant this new beginning. That aside, lets take a look at it.

Lets start with the good, and as most males in my age-bracket can testify too, Emma Stone definitely falls into this category. She really provides an interesting and endearing Gwen Stacy, the original girlfriend of Peter Parker. As always Stone seems natural and her character believable. That said: I really think that the relationship between Gwen and Peter was a little too simplistic in this movie and needed to be more developed.  They just sort of aren’t together and then kind of are and even though I am totally against Twilightesque melodrama (the trailer for Breaking Dawn Part 2, that greeted us prior Spider-man reeked of it), I really think that this romance could have been played up a lot more, which in turn would have made the experience a whole lot more emotionally significant.

Let’s get onto the big point of contention, Andrew  Garfield’s Peter Parker.  I know that this reboot was aimed at trying to bring the films closer to the comicbook interpretation of Parker, but it seemed like they probably drew him a little past that. He is still an outsider, but his intelligence is downplayed and his nerdy persona has been outright dropped in exchange for a sweet outsider type and I don’t know if it works. Pete was still likeable and Garfields performance alright, but on the whole I felt as if it wasn’t the Peter Parker I knew. He wasn’t as easy to empathise with, his struggles didn’t seem to be as awful and his character didn’t seem to grow at all over the movie. The powers had seemingly little affect on him and this was certainly a disappointment. Spider-man as a comic’s strength has always been that the man behind the mask is kind of a nerd who is really easy for the target reader to empathise with. Garfield’s Pete seemed like the cool guy who isn’t seen as cool, a bit of a metahuman James Dean… that no one in school likes.

Spider-man himself was pretty awesome, The new design is sleak and the overall appearance of the character much more in tone with the lanky, web-slinger from the comics. The transitions between live action and CGI were a little jarring. The first time it went from an animated Spider-man swinging through the city to the costumed Garfield standing rooftop felt very off. I’m not a CGI expert by any means but this definitely felt like it needed more polishing, as this really didn’t seem like an issue in the original trilogy.

The plot is the great weakness of the film. It is clearly the intent that this be the first part of a series, in which we find out what happened to Pete’s parents and Spider-man grows from boy to man. Nothing about the story felt special, and its qualities were further dimmed by how close the overall plot was to the 2002 Spiderman. The lizard is a thoroughly unbelievable villain and his character twists felt unrealistic and to be blunt lame. He made for good fights but that is about it. The story felt extremely linear in the sense that there was no real development; the piece was entirely propelled by plot. What I am trying to say is this movie lacks heart. Events just sort of happen and as entertaining as they were there doesn’t seem to be a unique or even slightly marked emotional journey here. Things happen, characters move with them, like people strapped into a rollercoaster. Sure it is exciting…. But I didn’t feel anything.

‘The Amazing Spider-man” is not a bad movie, but due to its temporal proximity to the original trilogy it is always going to live in its shadow. The action sequences are exciting and the characters likeable. The effects are incredible, and Spider-man swinging over the Manhattan skyline is addictive fun. Unfortunately, the film lacks the soul of the original films. No emotional journey transpires. I have faith though that this could expand into a very interesting series and perhaps in time it will stand alone as a small part to a greater, sleaker, websling-ier spiderman franchise. As a nerd I can only hope.

Alex,
Call a doctor, my spider sense is tingling.